11 March 2009

Crystal Ball: Apple's $599 "iPad Touch" Netbook (with pictures)


They say a picture is worth a thousand words so how better to illustrate what I think an Apple "netbook" might look like than to design what I'd build if I were them. I've affectionately called it the "Apple iPad Touch" - not because it's a particularly clever name but because it's close to "iPod" and thus avoids having to create a new "iNote", "iNet" or similar logo. There's been renewed discussion (e.g. here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here) about such a device of late thanks to rumours that Chinese manufacturers Wintek and Quanta will make the screens and manufacture the devices respectively, and confirmation by Dow Jones Newswires via "two people close to the situation".

The device would be bigger than an iPhone but smaller than a MacBook (actually it would be quite similar to the lid/screen of a MacBook on its own) and would be both light and durable. It may come with a protective case to protect its large, glass screen but these would definitely be available optionally and/or from third parties. It would stick with the aluminium/black glass theme, though given the appearance of the high density plastic backing for the iPhone 3G the temptation would be to make multi-coloured and/or special editions available, going back to the iBook clamshell roots.

The interface would be a breeze to use and the multitouch functions would be even more spectacular than when they first appeard on the iPhone. Thanks to advancements in the upcoming Safari 4, navigating to your faviourite sites would be as simple as clicking on a thumbnail in the new coverflow style speed dialer and the browsing experience will be similar to, but thanks to the extra power and pixels, much better than that of the iPhone. Multimedia (including video) will also be a pleasure to watch on its large high definition screen (but you'll have to keep an eye on the battery) and finding what you want will be trivial thanks to CoverFlow:
Here's the suggested specs:
  • ARM processor (1Ghz+)
  • 256-512Mb RAM
  • 32-64 Gb flash drive (ala iPhone, primarily for audio & video media)
  • iPhone-style stripped back Mac OS X operating system
  • 9-10" Widescreen HD ~800x400 multi-touch screen (with LED backlighting)
  • Built-in microphone, speakers and webcam.
  • Battery replacement program (for a clean, catch free finish)
  • WiFi connectivity (802.11 b/g/n)
  • WiMax connectivity (maybe saved for 2nd gen release, 802.16e-2005?)
  • 3G service (potentially with carrier contract)
While it would have been nice to break the psychological barriers given the current economic climate by hitting the $499 price point, price at launch would be around $599.00/€499.00/£449.00, and while unlocked iPhone 3G's sell around that today (in Australia they're apparently around USD550), supply with or without a 3G carrier contract may affect the price.

Connectivity is key so it will support at least WiFi, but for "always connected" service 3G may be required. WiMax may also be an option in some regions to provide connectivity while side-stepping the mobile networks. Given good connectivity the iPhone's dialer functionality may make an appearance too, but rather than holding the thing up to your head you'd have to go for a bluetooth headset, and similarly if you were bored with the onscreen keyboard then a bluetooth Apple Wireless Keyboard would be your only option. The charging cradle would sport the traditional iPod connector and a slot with a photo-frame style appendage for holding the device at an adjustable angle, facilitating the use of the keyboard and making the device a pleasure to use on the road (e.g. on trains/planes).

Although full-blown Mac OS X is pictured above, in reality a significantly reduced feature set would be available via an iPhone, Front Row and/or Cover Flow style interface running on something akin to Snow Leopard. This would be the main thing preventing cannibalisation of MacBook sales - the included AppStore wouldn't include mainstream apps like iWork and Microsoft Office. Basic functionality would be provided via a suite of cloud computing tools like iWork.com but the absence of a keyboard would be another limiting factor. Similarly a lot of the media management would depend on a more traditional device (like the iPhone and Apple TV), but that doesn't really matter since most of the content would be accessed over the Internet (at least when a high speed connection is available). Make no mistake - being a "netbook" this will largely be a single-purpose device, for watching YouTube videos, interacting with friends on Facebook, reading news feeds and so on. Nobody said netbooks had to be small or cheap but instant-on, constant connectivity is a must.

I for one would line up for this device (well, I'd submit an online order anyway) and if I were Steve Jobs I'd make its release my "I'm Back!" message.

Update: There's evidence of new devices in the iPhone 3.0 OS images including the iProd and iFPGA. The iProd is likely a personal trainer device, though my initial reaction was a touch interface ala the tablet above. The iFPGA on the other hand is certainly referring to a different type of chip than the usual ASICs that can be programmed at the hardware level to function differently - this could well be a new architecture for the new devices.

Company and product names are trademarks of the respective owners, some images courtesy Wikipedia.

This work by Sam Johnston is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Creative Commons License

10 comments:

Garrett Moffitt said...

Why not like an Apple Air,but with the screen where the keyboard is?

Sam Johnston said...

Yeah I considered that too but more people know what a macbook looks like than a MacBook Air. In fact I expect the design to be heavily borrowed from the MacBook Air, only based on an ARM chip rather than Intel.

tmor said...

I'm wondering if you've seen this:

"New startup beats Apple to the punch with touchscreen netbook"

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=1247&tag=nl.e101

Bloggenstein said...

Oh, I forgot to mention that the new touchscreen netbook featured in the article I linked to in my previous comment is also.. are you ready?

A REFRIGERATOR MAGNET!

Now who will not want one of those?

Sam Johnston said...

I hadn't seen it - actually it was posted the day after I wrote this article. That is so freakin' cool... and their solution to the problem of having to hold the thing while you watch movies and so on is certainly novel. The main thing that concerns be now is the various patents around touch screen interfaces and multi-touch... I hope Apple and Microsoft in particular don't interfere with open source innovation in this area but sadly given the state of the US patent system I fear they will.

Sam Johnston said...

So seems I've been beaten to it by 12-18 months by Chris Messina. I guess if two of us can come up with this independently (right down to the name) then we're probably not far wrong.

arf said...

y

Anonymous said...

Here's one for $299

http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/

Anonymous said...

Its right around the corner.

Sam Johnston said...

That may be true but I'm not sure I'll be buying it given Apple's shenanigans with the App Store. I want the freedom of the native web, not more shackles.

Sam

Post a Comment